Re: [ox-en] Commons in a taxonomy of goods
Ar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.politics.oekonux.english |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stefan, have you written about this somewhere? On Jun 17, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Diego Saravia <dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected]> wrote: > [Converted from multipart/alternative] > > [1 text/plain] > economy is a social science, > a good is not a good without society > > all goods properties are social ones. > > I do not understand what do you want to say with this text: > > "Scarcity is not a goods property, but a social form of goods to be > produced (namely: commodity)." > > If you have 5 apples and 6 persons, and every person want an apple > you can > say that apples are scarce > > so you need people and apples, its a social problem > > but I do not understand what this can mean in terms off clasical goods > clasification for you > > > 2010/6/16 Stefan Meretz <stefan-/[email protected]> > >> On 2010-06-16 23:00, Stefan Meretz wrote: >>>> economic goods could be rival/non rival and exclusive/non exclusive >>> >>> All goods can be rival/non rival and be made exclusive/non >>> exclusive. >> >> I wanted to say: Not only economic, but all goods can be... >> >> This does not mean, that each single good can either rival or non >> rival. >> Here we have the difference to excludability: Rivalry is a goods >> property, exclusion is a social result. >> >> Ciao, >> Stefan >> >> -- >> Start here: www.meretz.de >> _________________________________ >> Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ >> Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ >> Contact: [email protected] >> > > > > -- > Diego Saravia > [email protected] > NO FUNCIONA->dsa-AySywPH+/[email protected] > > > [2 text/html] > > _________________________________ > Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ > Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ > Contact: [email protected] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: [email protected]