Re: cycle-paths, safe or not
David Whitmon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.recreation.bicycle.touring.phred |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The town of West Tisbury here on Martha's Vineyard is possibly the most progressive town we have here. There is about 6 or 7 miles of bike paths within the state forest that is in West Tisbury. Their official stance is that they have a network perfectly fine multi user facilities called the public road ways. Now if we could only require that all holders of licenses to drive motor vehicles be mandated to go through added training to get it through their collective C.R I. (Cranial Rectal Inversion) brains that cyclists are road users and have every right to be out there on the road as we all know we do. David On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Joe DeLory wrote: > While I agree there are many advantages to have ing cycle-paths, it > would be prohibitively expensive and practically impossible to > create a system of paths that would reach every destination. > Construction of cycle-paths should be viewed as an adjunct (not a > substitute) to making the streets safer for ALL users. I also hope > that construction of more "bike specific" facilities does not lead > to "mandatory side path laws" > _______________________________________________ > Touring mailing list > [email protected] > Browse and search the archives: http://search.bikelist.org > Unsubscribe or list settings: > http://www.phred.org/mailman/options/touring