SPC Gearbox
[email protected] Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:23:38 +0000 (GMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.recreation.cars.sevens |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The SPC box is a cracker, I`ve driven Tim`s old car which had one. I`ll be ordering one with the same ratios as Vinnie for the new duratec powered Birkin. From what I`ve seen the quality of the boxes are superb too. Vinnie did you get any extras like alloy case, cover or uprated internal bits and pieces? Simon > from: Nigel Marston <[email protected]> > date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 13:07:51 > to: [email protected] > subject: RE: [Sevens] 7 or 8 inches sir? (Or madam) :-) > > > From: [email protected] > > > > >Got an LSD yet? > > > No, but thanks for your help. The one I tracked down (with > > your help ta) looked a tad overpriced and I decided to hold > > my horses. I'm not in a rush, I have all winter and to be > > honest I'd rather spend 500 quid on a new Quaife ATB plus > > fitting than the same (500)on a used Suretrac, which is > > what was offered. I made a counter offer for the suretrac > > btw which was rejected. > > Oh well. If you get into a similar situation again, a used gear-type > probably has negligible wear. They're supposed to run forever. That > said, if the differential (pun intended) between a new and used one is > less than 25% then you're probably right to withdraw. > > > >Anxious to hear what you think of it as I recommended it. > > > Yeah, I know and I am pretty sure its going to be a total > > disaster. I have my litigation lawyer on stand by. BTW, thanks > > for putting your confession in writing, we really needed that > > for our case :-))))))))) > > Someone's been spoofing my email addy again. Damn them. > > > >Did you ever get the ratios? I'd like to run them through the > > >gearing calc. > > > Gear Ratio's SPC Semi helical box, 2.39, 1.54, 1.21, 1.00, > > 0.87: I've run it through the calc prog a few times, (3.92 > > diff, 7750 red line) it all looks quite exciting with me > > reaching squiglymillion miles an hour in first gear and then > > up to severallyzillion in second.....:-)))Ooooh and did I > > mention my new semi transparent flywheel :-))) > > No. got a pic of the new flywheel? Have you resolved what clutch to fit? > > Just thought I'd post the differences between the standard type-9 (2 > litre Sierra box) against your new one. "Interesting" doesn't cover it. > "Superb" might. Hope Se7ens.net doesn't bugger up the formatting. > > I've put 22 inch driven wheels in and then at the bottom (3rd chart) my > own setup. Ignore the max power column. I'm interested by the > similarities and differences like we both will hit 52mph in 1st at (our > own) max revs and that we're within a hair of each others "potential" > top speed. > > This shows (to me) that you have an intelligently spaced set of ratios. > You only have to compare it with the original box (chart 1) to see how > silly the normal 5-speeder is in a Se7en. > > Chart 1 - Original type-9 Sierra 2 litre > Gear Mph per 1000 RPM Mph @7500 RPM Mph @7750 RPM > -------------------------------------------------------- > 1 4.57 34 35 > 2 8.48 64 66 > 3 12.19 91 94 > 4 16.70 125 129 > 5 20.36 153 158 > > > Chart 2 - Vinnie's new box > Gear Mph per 1000 RPM Mph @7500 RPM Mph @7750 RPM > -------------------------------------------------------- > 1 6.99 52 54 > 2 10.84 81 84 > 3 13.80 103 107 > 4 16.70 125 129 > 5 19.19 144 149 > > Chart 3 - Caterham 6-speed with 3.62 diff/8000rpm rev limit > Gear Mph per 1000 RPM Mph @7750 RPM Mph @8000 RPM > -------------------------------------------------------- > 1 6.72 52 54 > 2 9.00 70 72 > 3 11.37 88 91 > 4 13.70 106 110 > 5 16.00 124 128 > 6 18.08 140 145 ------------------------------------------------- To manage your subscription options visit :- http://mailman.se7ens.net/mailman/listinfo/sevens