Re: Deseq2 for down stream analysis
Fabrice Tourre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN31xkcS-N20tP7nxbdxPvG8eoq+ngEkQ-22qqjB1g2+SH-=2A@mail.gmail.com> |
Dear Mike, Thank you for your reply. I need a matrix for each gene and sample for gene set enrichment analysis. In you example, how will about this situation: [0,0,0] vs [1,2,3] [0,0,0] vs [10,10,10] I have a lot such case genes. On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Michael Love <[email protected]> wrote: > hi Fabrice, > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Fabrice Tourre <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear expert, >> >> I've been using DESeq for my RNA-Seq differential expression analysis. >> Now I want to do GSEA. I have got follow expression value. which one >> should I used for the down stream analysis? > > Please provide more details about the downstream analysis. > > Do you need a matrix of values for each gene and sample, or just the > test statistic for each gene? > >> rc, rld or vsd? >> >> rc <- counts(dds) >> rld <- rlog(dds) >> vsd <- varianceStabilizingTransformation(dds) >> rlogMat <- assay(rld) >> vstMat <- assay(vsd) >> >> Then I want to use the DESeq result to generate a ranked-list, which >> will be used as the input in GSEA. My question is: Should I rank the >> genes using the fold changes or using the q-values? >> > > You can use the shrunken fold changes or p-values for ranking. The > fold change measures the effect itself, while the p-value is a > function of how distinct the changes are, so the signal over the > noise. For example, consider a comparison of two groups with three > values each (here continuous values just for demonstration): [3,4,5] > vs [1,2,3] has a fold change of 2, whereas [11,11,11] vs [10,10,10] > has a fold change of 1.1. but the second comparison will have a lower > p-value because the variance within groups is so small. > > Mike > >> Thank you very much in advance. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list [email protected] https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor