Re: Deseq2 for down stream analysis

Fabrice Tourre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
Message-ID <CAN31xkcDimG4SteeZ2=Trezwg6C0eh+ZcZmb7tag15CZu+Ck4w@mail.gmail.com>
I need this matrix as the input for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
(GSEA, http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/)

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Fabrice Tourre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Mike,
>
> Thank you for your reply. I need a matrix for each gene and sample for
> gene set enrichment analysis.
>
> In you example, how will about this situation:
>
> [0,0,0] vs [1,2,3]
>
> [0,0,0] vs [10,10,10]
>
> I have a lot such case genes.
>
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Michael Love
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> hi Fabrice,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Fabrice Tourre <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Dear expert,
>>>
>>> I've been using DESeq for my RNA-Seq differential expression analysis.
>>> Now I want to do GSEA. I have got follow expression value. which one
>>> should I used for the down stream analysis?
>>
>> Please provide more details about the downstream analysis.
>>
>> Do you need a matrix of values for each gene and sample, or just the
>> test statistic for each gene?
>>
>>> rc, rld or vsd?
>>>
>>> rc <- counts(dds)
>>> rld <- rlog(dds)
>>> vsd <- varianceStabilizingTransformation(dds)
>>> rlogMat <- assay(rld)
>>> vstMat <- assay(vsd)
>>>
>>> Then I want to use the DESeq result to generate a ranked-list, which
>>> will be used as the input in GSEA. My question is: Should I rank the
>>> genes using the fold changes or using the q-values?
>>>
>>
>> You can use the shrunken fold changes or p-values for ranking. The
>> fold change measures the effect itself, while the p-value is a
>> function of how distinct the changes are, so the signal over the
>> noise. For example, consider a comparison of two groups with three
>> values each (here continuous values just for demonstration): [3,4,5]
>> vs [1,2,3] has a fold change of 2, whereas [11,11,11] vs [10,10,10]
>> has a fold change of 1.1. but the second comparison will have a lower
>> p-value because the variance within groups is so small.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioconductor mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>>> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor

_______________________________________________
Bioconductor mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.