Re: [dinosaur] Parirau, new pterosaur from Late Cretaceous of New Zealand (free pdf)
"David Marjanovic" <[email protected]> Sun, 22 Dec 2019 01:33:21 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.dinosaurs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <trinity-4427075f-c9a7-432f-844f-6db0ff5a17ad-1576974801934@3c-app-gmx-bs09> |
<html><head></head><body><div style=3D"font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0= px;"><div>=0D=0A<div name=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padd= ing: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word= ; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">=0D=0A<= div style=3D"margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Sonntag, 22. Dezembe= r 2019 um 00:04 Uhr<br/>=0D=0A<b>Von:</b> [email protected]</di= v>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div name=3D"quoted-content">=0D=0A<div>Since this is a prepr= int on a website made for hosting manuscripts and not published in a peer-r= eviewed journal, I don’t think this constitutes a valid naming.</div>= =0D=0A</div>=0D=0A</div>=0D=0A</div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div>=0D=0A<div>=0D=0A<div>= =0D=0A<div> </div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div>Peer review is</div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<di= v> </div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div style=3D"margin-left: 40px;"><strong>!!! NOT= !!!</strong></div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div> </div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div>required f= or nomenclatural validity under the ICZN. (It <strong>will</strong> be unde= r the PhyloCode.)</div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div> </div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div>(Short= digression: the notion that peer review is a basic component of science is= much younger than many people think. Not only did nobody review Linnaeus, = but Nature wasn't peer-reviewed till the 1970s, many small European jou= rnals weren't peer-reviewed into the 1990s, and edited books often stil= l aren't AFAIK. Unlike with a preprint server, the editors read and rev= iewed the manuscripts, but didn't generally send them out to anyone els= e. Einstein got very angry once when he found out an editor had sent his ma= nuscript to someone for review; he said he hadn't given the editor perm= ission to send it to anyone, especially the person who got it.)</div>=0D=0A= =0D=0A<div> </div>=0D=0A=0D=0A<div><strong>However</strong>, what kill= s the name is <a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps= -3A__code.iczn.org_criteria-2Dof-2Dpublication_article-2D8-2Dwhat-2Dconstit= utes-2Dpublished-2Dwork_-23art-2D8-2D5&d=3DDwMBaQ&c=3DclK7kQUTWtAVE= OVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=3DRy_mO4IFaUmGof_Yl9MyZgecRCKHn5g4z1CY= JgFW9SI&m=3DNUdY46cgKKN_Ry0iFE_ys2yFMdx2iASDLwmz4en9LG4&s=3Dki58tZk= lz6BifLiOXGn3LKZxKuwTkyOrpFrUFddDjOk&e=3D">ICZN Art. 8.5.3.2</a>: "= ;The entry in the Official Register of Zoological Nomenclature [ =3D ZooBan= k] must give an ISBN for the work or an ISSN for the journal containing the= work." bioRχiv doesn't have an ISSN, so game over until the m= anuscript comes out in a journal that has one and is either printed or regi= stered in ZooBank anew. Although not a nomen nudum (that would be specifica= lly a name that fails <a href=3D"https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u= =3Dhttps-3A__code.iczn.org_chapter-2D4-2Dcriteria-2Dof-2Davailability_artic= le-2D13-2Dnames-2Dpublished-2Dafter-2D1930_&d=3DDwMBaQ&c=3DclK7kQUT= WtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=3DRy_mO4IFaUmGof_Yl9MyZgecRCKHn5g= 4z1CYJgFW9SI&m=3DNUdY46cgKKN_Ry0iFE_ys2yFMdx2iASDLwmz4en9LG4&s=3Dgj= wAPp32XpZBju5UFlFgwvs_7iX4JeZT78PpPoJKfSA&e=3D">Art. 13</a>, which is n= ot the case here), the name is unavailable at present.</div>=0D=0A</div>=0D= =0A</div>=0D=0A</div></div></body></html>=0D=0A=