Re: Mr. Bird has 2 wings (was: essentials of a gadri system)

Invent Yourself <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:

>
> la djan cusku di'e
>
> > I am using the word "carnivore" in the sense not of an animal that eats
> > animal flesh, but in the sense of an animal that (with trivial exceptions)
> > eats nothing else.
>
> Mr Bird is carnivore only in some instances. If we say that a
> person is "vegetarian" if they will not eat meat, then someone can
> be vegetarian at a given time time, even though they have eaten meat
> before they became vegetarian. Similarly, Mr Bird can be carnivore
> in a given instance.


If we allow Mr. Bird to assume all the properties of every bird, one at a
time, what is the use of such a concept?

I think that at one time, when lo'e was understood to mean "typical", mi
viska lo'e cipni meant I saw something that had 2 wings. Mr. Bird
sometimes has one wing; if I allow the lo'e cipni which I saw to be
interpreted by others as possibly having one wing, it seems rather a
useless concept.

ni'ocu'i

We think of the typical lion as having a mane, but really, that only
reflects the males, which might be only half the lion population.



-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.