Re: The two lo'es (was: essentials of a gadri system)

Jorge "Llamb?as" <jjllambias2000-/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Message-ID <[email protected]>
la and cusku di'e

> Certainly this is preferable -- to use na'o (or ta'e?) when typicality is
> being talked about.
> 
> But we're not at the stage -- either analytically or politically -- where
> we can productively start discussing reassignment of cmavo.

Ok, I'm not in a hurry.

In any case, today's discussion has been extremely productive for 
me, because I finally can understand CLL-lo'e. If the equation
CLL-lo'e = ka'u + Kind-lo'e + na'o(or ta'e) is generally accepted
then this will clarify our arguments enormously.

As for reassignment, in my case lo'e was assigned to Kind in 1994 
so restricting it to CLL-lo'e would constitute the reassignment.
But I'm willing to wait and evaluate all options. 

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.