Re: three pairs of shoes & excellent solutions
"And Rosta" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Organization | Livagian Consulate |
| Message-ID | <002701c35c6f$a79215c0$6f3c0751@oemcomputer> |
pier:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 10:38, Jorge "Llambías" wrote:
> > That's true. But {cutci remei ta'upei} is a legitimate question,
> > and we should have an answer.
> >
> > I would answer {remei lo'e cutci}.
>
> That has to be {remei lo'i cutci}
lo'i cutci is the set of all shoes. x2 of mei seems to be the set
corresponding to x1, so lo'i cutci is wrong for x2.
> as x2 of PAmei is a set. Or you could say {remei fi lo cutci}.
I don't know what "whose members are x3" means. If it means "whose
members include", then "fi lo cutci" means "pair containing at least
one shoe"".
--And.