Re: Re: lo and intension (was: essentials of a gadri system)
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And Rosta scripsit: > I don't see why le'e should be any different from lo'e. In a context where > lo'i jbopre cu du le'i prenu, it will be the case that lo'e jbopre cu du > le'e prenu. Very true, and that means that speaking Lojban is part of your stereotype of persons, or that Lojban-speakers are prototype persons. -- Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x) Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun" jcowan-k6JZYsoqQQ8PxK1qzZLvrwC/[email protected]