Re: lVi & xod-collectives

"And Rosta" <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:32:01 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske
Organization	Livagian Consulate
Message-ID	<016301c370a6$a78502e0$02e1fea9@oemcomputer>

xorxes:
> la and cusku di'e
>
> > What do people make of my suggestion that loi/lei/lai be
xod-collectives?
> > The result would leave all the gadri well-defined (apart from
lo'e/le'e).
>
> Would the quantified forms differ from the lo/le/la versions?

Quantified forms are analogous to lo/le/la. They don't yield a distinct
meaning when quantifying over members, but they do when quantifying over
avatars
and subkinds.

See http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/XXS%3A%20Extended%20XS%20proposal


--And.