Re: The place structure of {speni} in regards to cultural neutrality

At 02:49 PM 10/15/03 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>Arnt Richard Johansen scripsit:
>
> > Doesn't this entail monogamy, or at least a dyadic relation?
>
>Monogamy, no; a dyadic relation, yes.  However, there is nothing
>to prevent you from creating a lujvo with the place structure
>x1 belongs to marriage group x2.

Back in the day when such things weren't controversial, one would say da 
speni de joi di (and for that matter da speni de .e di); I'll leave it to 
the jboskeists whether these mean something totally other than "what lojbab 
had in mind")

lojbab

-- 
lojbab                                             [email protected]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GP4qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/