Re: bu, zo
"John Cowan" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:32:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And Rosta scripsit: > Why do we have BU, rather than having bu in ZO? Is there > a practical reason it was done the way it is? Well, the only thing that comes to mind is that .abu, .ebu flow better than bu.a, bu.e. In Loglan, the vowel letters were asi, esi, and si -> bu in the Great Lojban Cmavo Shift. -- John Cowan jcowan-k6JZYsoqQQ8PxK1qzZLvrwC/[email protected] www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. --_Specht v. Netscape_ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GP4qlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/