Re: bu, zo
Jorge "Llamb?as" <jjllambias2000-/[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:23:02 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- And Rosta <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do we have BU, rather than having bu in ZO? Is there > a practical reason it was done the way it is? It would have made more sense to have BU prefixed rather than postfixed, but it would still not be in ZO if we wanted it to create lerfu which can be combined into lerfu strings. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GP4qlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/