Re: Quantification of quoted text (was Re: BPFK Section: gadri)
"Jordan DeLong" <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:44:16 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.lojban.jboske |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 08:20:25PM -0700, Jorge LlambĂas wrote: > Jordan: [...] > > It's also the same as predicate logic. A formula *is* the sequence > > of symbols. It is always the same formula if it is the same sequence > > of symbols (and therefore there is only one of each formula). > > > > Does this make any sense? > > What do we gain by being so restrictive? What do we lose if we allow > quantification over instances? I think we lose a little bit of rigor. There aren't really instances of lojban formulas, so quantifying over them makes no sense. -- Jordan DeLong [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAyiewDrrilS51AZ8RAjHoAJ9DKcb3F/ZF30n2+VS1GDKvPqfxwQCgu/2R FITpXrf8WYHXtroKjBI+7Ic= =AkGV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----