Re: Adminship request for vo:

From: "Flauto Dolce" [email protected]
> A couple of us--literally two so far--have been trying to revive the
Volapük
> Wikipedia (Vükiped).  I have started work on a new main page and have been
> thinking about how to deal with the seemingly inappropriate content that
is
> cluttering it up now (Volapük-English dictionary entries, stories in
Volapük,
> and an entry in Polish recently added by an anonymous user).  User Jmb has
> started several articles in Volapük.  Because there are no administrators
on
> board, though, we are a bit limited in what we can do.

Glidis! Thanks for coming to the rescue of the vo.wiki
I started it and promoted it on the Volapük List. But I had
to give my attention to the other wikis, specially the
Interlingua one which took off and has had a lot of traffic.
I'm happy that you're serious about developing the vo.wiki.
I'm sorry I wasn't able to devote more time to it.
I did put up a lot of information on Volapük in the
yahoogroups files section, word lists, dictionaries,
grammars etc. You're welcome to these materials.
The German dictionary and the Grammar are all
scanned in now, also I put up all the Sirkuylapenayds
online at http://www.geocities.com/sirkuylapenayd/

Since we moved on to the new software and the domain
extension change I lost the admin access there. So it's pretty
messy in the vo.wiki and there's a need for a lot of housekeeping.
If you can restore my admin access I'd appreciate it.

I've also put up some photos at the yahoogroups site
which we could use in the vo.wiki, pictures of Schleyer, etc.,
it would be good to be able to document the history of the
language and its conferences.

What do you think?

Jay B. [[User:ILVI]]