Re: How does the localisation of MediaWiki work (using Beta-wiki)
Gerben van der Stouwe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.nederlands |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bijvoorbeeld hier: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Categories http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Categoryarticlecount Maar dat is mi. geen argument om ze van nl zomaar te verwijderen. Plural werkt hier net zo goed. Gerben Teun Spaans schreef: > Gerard, > > je schrijft ''Many messages now make use of the Plural > construct; this allows for the correct phrasing of singular of plural > forms of text in the messages.'' > > Heb je een voorbeeld dat dit in de nederlandstalige wiki gebruikt wordt? Ik > ben wel nieuwsgierig of dit goed gaat met onze gemengde +en en +s regels. > > teun > > > On 7/9/06, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hoi, >> Because of some misunderstanding let me try to explain how the latest >> method of localisation works. >> >> History: >> There used to be a situation that the localisation was done using a PHP >> message file. This file needed to be updated when new messages came >> about or when existing messages were changed. This happened because of >> work done on the MediaWiki software. In practice this worked not that >> well and there was also a need to have some messages changed to reflect >> a policy or whatever that was specific to a project. Because of this the >> messages exist. You can change and localise the messages in a project. >> >> The challenge: >> The bigger projects with the exception of the en.wikipedia have a lot of >> messages adapted for its language. For people for whom the project >> language is a foreign language, the PHP messages are used because it is >> all the information that is available to help. When a new project >> starts, it does not benefit from the localisation work done elsewhere. >> When a message is changed, it needs to be fixed for that language in ALL >> projects. >> >> The work being done: >> Nikerabbit and Gangleri have done absolutely great work by setting up a >> wiki that is there to manage the localisation of MediaWiki. The result >> of this project is that for many languages a proper localisation exists. >> In the process of getting as far as we are, many issues with right to >> left languages have been fixed both in the messages and in the core of >> the MediaWiki software.. Many messages now make use of the Plural >> construct; this allows for the correct phrasing of singular of plural >> forms of text in the messages. The messages are platform agnostic; they >> will however indicate the correct name of the project. >> >> The current issue: >> In order to make use of the standardised messages, it is important to >> use the standard messages and not have project specific messages that >> say the same thing. Deleting /these /messages ensure that when a message >> is changed, it will be part of the next update of the software. For the >> project specific messages, it is important that someone who maintains >> these messages is subscribed to the mediawiki-i18n-f4n82jGjeJOzKZ/[email protected] >> mailing list. This list is used to inform about the messages/issues that >> are of interest with respect to internationalisation. Wikimedia uses the >> MediaWiki messages in all its projects and in all the languages the >> message Outside the WMF there are many, many more wikis that will >> benefit from us doing a better job localising the software. >> >> The challenge: >> I have set myself the challenge to find more people to help with the >> localisation for more languages. MediaWiki is great software is excels >> because it has already been localised in so many languages. For those >> languages where it did not yet happen, we find that the projects are not >> doing that great. By finding interested people and organisations >> MediaWiki will become more usable. It will become not only more usable >> because it will become easier to start a project in languages like Akan >> or Xhosa it will also become more easy to read projects like the >> en.wikipedia as the user interface will no longer be a distraction. >> >> The question: >> What if any are the practical issues with this strategy. From my >> perspective there are only winners. * Project specific messages are >> unaffected * All other messages benefit from an effort designed to >> provide a timely and improved service. >> >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiNL-l discussielijst >> [email protected] >> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinl-l >> > _______________________________________________ > WikiNL-l discussielijst > [email protected] > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinl-l > _______________________________________________ WikiNL-l discussielijst [email protected] http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinl-l
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 888 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBRLH0D7eHJ0HgyxQCAQIcvw//Q1ISIsOfda3v3nRj821nlEPvZcegqzMi 87W4kl0qoHiNbGWHIFVzUPzZOvzeTHdCzViCrPMxE/DNSMROetsiqVRNbSmd4REl DpKs+IF3IwAUmvFbgxTIiGePmRqafiTIFr9ChpLLZpwL4gcWZC4g4gXTOxuw59Sn pDuEHrtpDGqV3vSIhKAlT8jX6SIo62oKhRL9ULrIj0pnC/ZyQ4p+BuArkt+nTt6f 2lwyFrEUU+8lTAa59noX7Mk6hklwK5X2Y8qnVS2hrgzZss5AWb0eiqpo3YV7cZrQ 7u2+lNT4YrdB1m1BIoiNZ75xF51qnQLRlf/Yns3kcvKOtTispFaSbcZNTuJ7HXF/ vAjBPYcuuHkmNFow9TH20zitWEF19xuw8/HxovEahWJmZYxJa3T9cvqv1hcCUPcX LFBYo8T/KERJpErWOBF63Cq6BEaoovLxVEXWmEmHECvhNM/kIMfWxdiVTULDLSvT jeJXh7ytEIAlyLTQtVIEcXsjWjx85vI8bmt+YfikWWpNa4zHmD9BHRmsXc1eH1f3 nkEnjRKgrURkpE+jBsgsMwApyQLzGagD3/idifNU4ytwQalUv7vq300iDijDETi0 MMCG64Tjgz4x8N9oPi/piDiOqsms93j6AVcpycgVaPVbjtHMdJ4cwHt7d8yKDgAx bwy07LLjzOI= =n6bG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----