Re: Physicists Disagree Over *Meaning* ! (interesting links)

"JAG" <jaguarnight2012-/[email protected]> Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:14 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Physicists Disagree Over *Meaning* of Quantum Mechanics, (Poll Shows)

http://www.livescience.com/26444-quantum-mechanics-physicists-poll.html


A Snapshot of Foundational *Attitudes* Toward Quantum Mechanics

http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069


Can we see now, why EVERYTHING depends on attitude/meaning/justification/explanation?

Can we see now that we can NOT have an *objective* SCIENCE since all method amd measurements are done and evaluated by *subjective* processes/experiences (in short, by ourselves)?

Can we see and recognize now the need for a *complementary* theory/science? is it possible?

what are the implictions of such theory/endeavor?

;)