Re: Physicists Disagree Over *Meaning* ! (interesting links)
"JAG" <jaguarnight2012-/[email protected]> Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:14 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.physics.fabric-of-reality |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Physicists Disagree Over *Meaning* of Quantum Mechanics, (Poll Shows) http://www.livescience.com/26444-quantum-mechanics-physicists-poll.html A Snapshot of Foundational *Attitudes* Toward Quantum Mechanics http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069 Can we see now, why EVERYTHING depends on attitude/meaning/justification/explanation? Can we see now that we can NOT have an *objective* SCIENCE since all method amd measurements are done and evaluated by *subjective* processes/experiences (in short, by ourselves)? Can we see and recognize now the need for a *complementary* theory/science? is it possible? what are the implictions of such theory/endeavor? ;)