Re: On Rock's master/next/stable and orocos-toolchain's master/stable

Hi Leo,

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
<[email protected]> wrote:
> A Dilluns, 27 de maig de 2013, Peter Soetens va escriure:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Sylvain Joyeux
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> > First issue: orocos/stable and autobuild/stable have diverged. I
>> > obviously don't want to update Rock's stable/next with code that did not
>> > get tested within the Rock workflow.
>> >
>> > Since we, so far, talked about having next/stable become the 'rock'
>> > branches, would you be OK with me force-pushing Rock's stable to
>> > orocos-toolchain's stable ? In the long run, we'll use the same branches
>> > so we will indeed converge ...
>>
>> No problem, but we'd better announce it on orocos-users as well.
>
> Peter, Sylvain,
>
> if the debian directory of rtt, typelib, utilmm, and ocl are not used, please
> could you rename it?
>
> I'm working on debianize orocos-toolchain and put in on debian under the
> debian-science group and these directories could make me collisions. If nobody
> are using it, maybe it could be a good idea for 2.7 rename it.

It's true that it's no longer frequently used, but why don't you use
it yourself ?
It was tuned to create packages for xenomai and gnulinux...

>
> Also, I have asked it before but no answer, if orocos developers maintains a
> fork of log4cpp and log4cpp is in debian and ubuntu, please could you think
> seriously to change the name?

It's hardly a fork, it's the only maintained version, so our version
should have a higher
version number than the Debian/Ubuntu version in a sense...

>
> If you change it, it could be easy to put it in debian/ubuntu ....
>

Peter
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev