Re: On Rock's master/next/stable and orocos-toolchain's master/stable

Hi Peter,

A Dimarts, 28 de maig de 2013, Peter Soetens va escriure:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > A Dilluns, 27 de maig de 2013, Peter Soetens va escriure:
> >> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Sylvain Joyeux
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> > First issue: orocos/stable and autobuild/stable have diverged. I
> >> > obviously don't want to update Rock's stable/next with code that did 
not
> >> > get tested within the Rock workflow.
> >> >
> >> > Since we, so far, talked about having next/stable become the 'rock'
> >> > branches, would you be OK with me force-pushing Rock's stable to
> >> > orocos-toolchain's stable ? In the long run, we'll use the same 
branches
> >> > so we will indeed converge ...
> >>
> >> No problem, but we'd better announce it on orocos-users as well.
> >
> > Peter, Sylvain,
> >
> > if the debian directory of rtt, typelib, utilmm, and ocl are not used, 
please
> > could you rename it?
> >
> > I'm working on debianize orocos-toolchain and put in on debian under the
> > debian-science group and these directories could make me collisions. If 
nobody
> > are using it, maybe it could be a good idea for 2.7 rename it.
> 
> It's true that it's no longer frequently used, but why don't you use
> it yourself ?
> It was tuned to create packages for xenomai and gnulinux...

I know, and I have used it a lot. And Sylvain did a good job too. I can do it, 
but AFAIK the idea is to make a git under debian-science tree. 

I'm not an expert of git, but do you know if it's possible to create a git 
repo remote and then sync theses directories to the official of orocos?

If yes, then I create this repos and after my job is done I ask a push of 
these to the gitorious .
 
> >
> > Also, I have asked it before but no answer, if orocos developers maintains 
a
> > fork of log4cpp and log4cpp is in debian and ubuntu, please could you 
think
> > seriously to change the name?
> 
> It's hardly a fork, it's the only maintained version, so our version
> should have a higher
> version number than the Debian/Ubuntu version in a sense...


I don't agree. Log4cpp has a debian package and maintained. Orocos team made a 
fork and IMHO should change the name.

Looking on the project, they have changes last year (2012-10-15 18:48 by 
sanchouss_) so, maybe it could be interested join the two forks, or separate 
it. Another question should be if the log4ccp developers would like to add the 
forked branch. Probably they didn't know about it.

Regards,

Leo
-- 
--
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[email protected]>
Institut d'Organització i Control de Sistemes Industrials -IOC-
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya -UPC-

Institute of Industrial and Control Engineering
Technical University of Catalonia
Avda. Diagonal 647, pl. 11
08028 BARCELONA (Spain)

Tel. +34-934017163
Fax. +34-934016605
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev