Re: rFSM catkinization

On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Markus Klotzbuecher wrote:

> Hi Ruben,
>
> On Do, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:28:47 +0100, Ruben Smits wrote:
>
>> we've cleanup our fork to remove the ugly guard changes we did. But we
>> did do a catkinization of rFSM. It just adds functionality, we do not
>> break any old use-cases. It just makes it possible now to include rFSM
>> in a catkin workspace and have all the LUA paths set up automatically.
>
> I'm not very enthusiastic about this patch, IMNSHO it's plain wrong that
> a generic software library needs to be changed for use in a specific
> framework.

I fully agree! This is an unmaintainable path...

>> Using this patch we can also seamlessly release rFSM into the ROS
>> ecosystem. (apt-get install ros-hydro-rFSM)
>>
>> pull request is available here: https://github.com/kmarkus/rFSM/pull/4
>
> I've merged it, since it seems to make your and other users life
> easier. But I think the long term goal should be to have a generic
> non-ros debian package.
>
> Markus

Herman
-- 
Orocos-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mech.kuleuven.be/mailman/listinfo/orocos-dev