Re: Mini meeting Toulouse 22-23 april / Execution Engine
Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204190904410.21624-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be> |
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Henrik I. Christensen wrote: > >> [...] > What I think is important to consider is that there > > CS> Independent of the internal structure of a component, it > CS> should behave in a specific way with respect to its > > I am not convinced that you are talking about the same kind of > components. There are SW components (i.e. components that can be > actived at run time through a "generic" interface, the java > ... variety) and their might be system components (basic units in > a system). I thought Genom was for the execution engine in the > system-unit things, but for the SW engr type components. Thus I think > we have to be careful with the terminology to ensure that we are > communicating and agreeing on the same thing. > Terminology is indeed _so_ important :-) Do you have concrete suggestions as to how to define the terminology in this context? Herman