RE: Project partners: another trial idea...

Herman Bruyninckx <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101030903470.27188-100000@pc25-213.mech.kuleuven.ac.be>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Häusler Kurt wrote:

[... about 0.5 man per partner...]
> One more disadvantage/concern:
>
> - work/task distribution amongst the partners is more difficult if there are
> more partners (e.g., how do you want to cope with this in the proposal stage
> or is that not an important aspect in such kind of funded open source
> projects?).
I indeed have to find a good motivation for defending this in the
proposal... I was thinking of the following:
  in the proposal, we have to find two responsibles for each Work
  Package; the reasons to choose two are: mutual motivation and
  control, and faster response times to external/internal contributions
  or remarks; there exist sufficient electronic tools to make people
  contribute closely, even when separated spatially.
I don't know whether this makes sense...

Herman
-- 
[email protected]
We hire Linux programmer: <http://www.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc/jobs>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.