Re: unprotected object - protected object - component ...
"Henrik I. Christensen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Herman I agree with your hierarchy of protection for objects. We will have to try to be very explicit about the level of access in objects (to avoid confusion). One thing that I really like about the Java approach to design of libraries is the consistency in access to members. I think it is essential that we try to have a similar standardization to allow for an easy learning curve. In Java if you have used it for a few days you can almost predict the accessors or data members to be used in objects. This is very convenient. Anders and I have started to draft the object hierarchy (and name space) for typical functions in a mobile robot navigation system. We are working on a standard document to give people an impression of the functionality and some basic functions in the hierarchy (where the missing entries will be filled out gradually by us or other contributors). Hopefully we can release a version of the document before July 1. Anders has promised to release his communication ... code this week (alpha release). With this and the basic hierarchy I hope we can start to build simple systems that can form a basis for evaluation of the design and also be a core for added functionality for mobility. --Henrik