Re: dynamic wiring
| Newsgroups | gmane.science.robotics.orocos.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | FAW Ulm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 [email protected] wrote: > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > The structure of Motion control core is predeterminated, components are linked togheter by a specific mediator. > > > Why introducing a dynamic wiring system? > > > Can you explain me with an example? > > > > > > > The SmartSoft framework explicitly addresses dynamic wiring of > > components, but is meant to be applied at a much higher abstraction > > level which should not be confused with the Leuven framework. > > No, but it is exactly the same thing at the conceptual level. Exactly > the same. At least, that's what I think. And so, I would welcome very > much efforts to also make the implementations and/or configuration > software as reusable as possible. > > > Think of components like a mapping component, a path > > planning component and a motion control component on a mobile platform. > These correspond to our Observer, Generator and Control components at > the real-time level. Ok, at the level of the Observer, Generator etc. it is exactly the same level as in SmartSoft. I was first thinking on dynamic wiring at the level of hot spots ... And I agree, that the "dynamic wiring" in that sense is an important aspect which is mainly raised by robotics people. It therefore really might be worth it to call it THE robotics pattern ... Christian -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Christian Schlegel FAW Ulm (Research Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing) PO Box 2060 D-89010 Ulm Germany Tel. : ++49 (731) 501 8949 Fax : ++49 (731) 501 999 email: [email protected] WWW : http://www.faw.uni-ulm.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------