Re: Robotics course notes with concrete kinematic models...

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:

[...]
> > Anyway, the project is about both aspects: "high level" and "low
> > level". Up to now we've seen mostly "high level", so it's really nice
> > to get some "low level" questions! Anyway, just make sure that you
> > choose an appropriate Subject line, and don't be afraid to start
> > another thread when the content of the discussion has shifted.
> 
> Thank's, I was a bit afraid. I'm a bit lost trying to understand the library 
> (there's a lot of headers but a few cpp files), the decoupling, the levels, 
> the .... Maybe it would be a good idea separate the modules, or define it in 
> something more concrete. That's all.
> 
You are absolutely right, and we know already for a long time that
some reorganisation is needed. We just need someone to do that. And
you seem to be the perfect candidate :-) Or rather, both of us; having
someone to work with would help me a lot in finally get this part of
the project going full steam...

Herman
-- 
  K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Engineering, Robotics Research Group
<http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~bruyninc> Tel: +32 16 322480