Re: [Skate] The Uni-Koeln awards 2016
| Newsgroups | gmane.sports.speedskating |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> 21. apr. 2016 kl. 16.32 skreiv Heyakeessie [email protected] [Speed_skating] <[email protected]>: > > I also support that every nomination between brackets should be > seconded. Do you define the rules for the KOLN skatelist or do we? This is Cinquanta behaviour. I’m taking pains to organise this poll, so I define the rules. But maybe we should just forget about the whole thing. I have plenty more to do. > If it is a majorite vote it is 3 against one. > There never have been fangroups here that massivley voted for irrelevant > candidates. If it happens we can talk about it. Even if the irrelevant candidates don’t get many votes, the votes cast for them are wasted and ought to be cast on the relevant candidates. Often the differences are small and wasted votes can tip the balance. Maybe we should have a discussion about the unseconded candidates. There could possible be good reasons for including some of them if not all. hilsen Lars Finsen / www.ortygia.no http://forhundrearsidaidag.blogspot.com http://ordordordordordord.blogspot.com Uriania pages: http://www.ortygia.no/uriania/uriania-eng.htm Oscar Diary: http://www.ortygia.no/Skoyter/Oscar/odfront.shtml Alt om skøyter: http://www.ortygia.no/Skoyter/AOS/AOSfront.shtml ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------