Re: Armadillo April 11, 2004
John Carmack <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.technology.erps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 09:54 AM 4/12/2004 -0700, you wrote: >John Carmack wrote: > >>http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=253 > >An off-the-wall thought on your hover tests and nitrogen capacity: if your >propellant tank has a manhole cover, maybe you can put some stainless >steel floats inside the tank to fill up some of the >ullage volume? They're available cheap from McMaster-Carr, plain 304 or >316 stainless spheres with no mounting spuds. > >http://tinyurl.com/2vver > >This might let you do a partial propellant load without needing god's own >GN2 supply. I had thought about putting something inside the tank to take up volume, and we had considered floats in the past for slosh control, so that sounds like a pretty good idea. Running the numbers for 20 cubic feet of floats: 308 x 6" = $23,562 129 x 8" = $15,205 38 x 12" = $15,382 Rather expensive. If we just wanted to cover the surface for slosh control, we would only need about 80 x 6". Interestingly, the full-up X-Prize propellant load in the bigger tank uses the same amount of nitrogen, because it starts with a higher pressure in a smaller amount of ullage. It is actually 100 lb of nitrogen, which is a strong incentive to use helium when you are aiming for max performance. John Carmack