Re: Armadillo April 11, 2004

John Carmack <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.technology.erps
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 09:54 AM 4/12/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>John Carmack wrote:
>
>>http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=253
>
>An off-the-wall thought on your hover tests and nitrogen capacity: if your 
>propellant tank has a manhole cover, maybe you can put some stainless 
>steel floats inside the tank to fill up some of the 
>ullage  volume?  They're available cheap from McMaster-Carr, plain 304 or 
>316 stainless spheres with no mounting spuds.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/2vver
>
>This might let you do a partial propellant load without needing god's own 
>GN2 supply.

I had thought about putting something inside the tank to take up volume, 
and we had considered floats in the past for slosh control, so that sounds 
like a pretty good idea.

Running the numbers for 20 cubic feet of floats:

308 x 6" = $23,562
129 x 8" = $15,205
38 x 12" = $15,382

Rather expensive.  If we just wanted to cover the surface for slosh 
control, we would only need about 80 x 6".

Interestingly, the full-up X-Prize propellant load in the bigger tank uses 
the same amount of nitrogen, because it starts with a higher pressure in a 
smaller amount of ullage.  It is actually 100 lb of nitrogen, which is a 
strong incentive to use helium when you are aiming for max performance.

John Carmack
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.