Re: Allow <info> as root element?
Dave Pawson <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Dec 2022 07:41:30 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.docbook.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4dZGCaVCAa_ZoJR9X34wDr5d+ETnpoLVipHn-0pfyqC9A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 20:16, Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it's always a balancing act between restricting the schema and to make it > flexible enough. > > I don't suggest nor endorse adding all and everything as start element. > However, maybe in the light of topic-oriented writing there might be elements > which could be useful to add like <info>. > > I can fully understand that you don't want to change this. As another > alternative would be to offer two variants: the normal, DocBook schema and a > schema suited more for assembly and topic-oriented writing. Rather contrasting? You're not prepared to alter your schemas, your validation nor your stylesheets, yet you ask the group to alter docbook to suite your needs? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.