Re: Allow <info> as root element?

Thomas Schraitle <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:51:44 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.text.docbook.misc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 01.12.22 08:41, Dave Pawson wrote:
> [...]
>
> Rather contrasting? You're not prepared to alter your schemas, your vali=
dation
> nor your stylesheets, yet you ask the group to alter docbook to suite
> your needs?

Maybe you misunderstood my intention or I phrased it badly. I just showed =
some
issues with the current DocBook schema. Others agreed and have the same.

I can live with it if <info> isn't part of the list of start elements. I'm=
 able
to circumvent this if this is the way to go. :)

What I'm trying to say is, maybe some of the design decision that was good=
 when
DocBook was created years ago should be reviewed in the light of the more
modern topic-oriented approach. Maybe we can all learn from each others. T=
hat's
all.

=2D-
Gru=C3=9F/Regards
   Thomas Schraitle