Re: [Docutils-users] Request for a patch release 0.19.1

develop list would be the correct destination ....


On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 12:21, Matthias Geier <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear docutils maintainers.
>
> A few months ago, I've reported a problem with sphinxcontrib-bibtex
> (https://github.com/mcmtroffaes/sphinxcontrib-bibtex/issues/309),
> which turned out to actually be a problem with docutils.
> There is also a related Sphinx issue
> (https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/10784) which shows that
> the problem can also appear without using sphinxcontrib-bibtex.
>
> The maintainer of sphinxcontrib-bibtex has kindly provided a patch
> (https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/patches/195/), which has already
> been merged in the meantime.
>
> I don't know the release procedure nor the roadmap of docutils, but
> would it be possible to create a new docutils release that contains
> this fix (and maybe other improvements)?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> In case you are wondering how the problem looks in practice, here is
> an example:
> https://nbsphinx.readthedocs.io/en/0.8.11/a-normal-rst-file.html#citations
>
> cheers,
> Matthias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Docutils-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-users
>
> Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list.
>