Re: Feature request: group dependency diagram
Dimitri Van Heesch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.doxygen.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ruud, There is already a GROUP_GRAPHS option that shows group relations when enabled (in combination with HAVE_DOT=YES). Maybe it already does what you want? Regards, Dimitri On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:56 , Ruud Althuizen wrote: > Hello, > > For a project I'm working on we have our packages and modules sorted into groups: > - layer > - package > - module > > Most of these modules depend on other packages/modules. We'd like to > generate a diagram that shows these depedencies. > > We were thinking about defining a new command, '\dependgroup', that gets > used the same way as '\ingroup'. So you define a group, where it falls under > and on which groups it depends as well. > > This way dependency diagrams can be generated, just like with header > includes. The reason that the header inclusion diagram isn't working for us > is that multiple includes can fit into a single package, we want to group > those together. > > I was looking at the Doxygen sources to create this functionality myself, > but I wasn't sure what I can reuse or what I need to change. If someone can > give me directions I can look into it myself. > > -- > With regards, > Ruud Althuizen > - www.stack.nl > - Unix commissie > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d_______________________________________________ > Doxygen-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d