Re: Feature request: group dependency diagram

Ruud Althuizen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.doxygen.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

Those graphs only show the hierarchy of the groups withing Doxygen. What we
have is a module defined as the group layer1/package2/module4 depending on
layer3/package5/module1 and layer4/package10/module2. (The group names in
this example are only used to represent their location in the layers of the
below layout.)

What this means is that one module can depend on other modules residing in a
completely other layer and/or package. We could create these diagrams
manually per module, but then we have to manually add dependencies of
dependencies.

On Fri 18 Mar 2011 12:13 PM, Dimitri Van Heesch wrote:
> There is already a GROUP_GRAPHS option that shows group relations
> when enabled (in combination with HAVE_DOT=YES). Maybe it already does
> what you want?
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:56 , Ruud Althuizen wrote:
> > For a project I'm working on we have our packages and modules sorted into groups:
> > - layer
> >  - package
> >    - module
> > 
> > Most of these modules depend on other packages/modules. We'd like to
> > generate a diagram that shows these depedencies.
> > 
> > We were thinking about defining a new command, '\dependgroup', that gets
> > used the same way as '\ingroup'. So you define a group, where it falls under
> > and on which groups it depends as well.
> > 
> > This way dependency diagrams can be generated, just like with header
> > includes. The reason that the header inclusion diagram isn't working for us
> > is that multiple includes can fit into a single package, we want to group
> > those together.
> > 
> > I was looking at the Doxygen sources to create this functionality myself,
> > but I wasn't sure what I can reuse or what I need to change. If someone can
> > give me directions I can look into it myself.
> > 
> > -- 
> > With regards,
> > Ruud Althuizen
> > - www.stack.nl
> > - Unix commissie
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> > for your organization - today and in the future.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d_______________________________________________
> > Doxygen-develop mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop
> 

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Ruud Althuizen
- www.stack.nl
- Unix commissie

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d

_______________________________________________
Doxygen-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-develop
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 196 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2DSPAACgkQkqncCMFskRUD0wCghkG7j2Ec2MNA7cYaHHnt8QLH
Ok4AnRzPtXoGBTiw4MDCy31iQXgVP+Ir
=sZrP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.