Re: new-document and doc-processing menu behavior

Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.refdb.devel
Message-ID <20031211001206.GC1696@theThirdPoliceman>
Markus Hoenicka <[email protected]> writes:

> Michael Smith writes:
>  > But AFAICT, there is currently no way, from the command line, of
>  > having the RefDB command-line toolchain create a Makefile for an
>  > existing document. Seems like what's needed is a "new Makefile" script
>  > -- 'refdbnm' or whatever.
>  > 
> 
> It shouldn't be too hard to add a command-line switch to refdbnd that
> suppresses the creation of the skeleton document. This way you could
> create a Makefile for an existing document.

That makes sense. As I mentioned, I think also you might need to add
some logic for asking whether the existing doc uses short or full
notations, since there's not guarantee that the user has followed the
'*.short.*' convention that the current generated Makefiles expect for
short-notation documents.

  --Mike
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 155 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE/17ZWsGCNMsnBsxkRAlgjAJ9NlNAW0IGGzvyaerXWpK1+x0L7DQCfTin0
ywM5XMSLu00U3oaEpLpotJI=
=bEgO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.