Re: MySQL v. PostgreSQL

Hallöchen!

Markus Hoenicka writes:

> Quoting Torsten Bronger <[email protected]>:
>
>> 0.8.2 for both.
>
> I think that explains it. The bug in dbd_mysql.c I was talking
> about was fixed in revision 1.93 on Dec 11, 2007 (see
> http://libdbi-drivers.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libdbi-drivers/libdbi-drivers/drivers/mysql/dbd_mysql.c?view=log). 0.8.2
> was released in Feb 2007. Is there a way to upgrade libdbi and
> libdbi-drivers to 0.8.3?

No, but I'm sure this would solve the problem then.  It sounds
highly plausible.

Okay, so the only issue that remains is that you can't (sanely)
search for patterns like M.ller.  You need it e.g. if you don't know
whether Müller was inserted into the DB as Muller or Müller.
Admittetly, this use case is rare but it may be confusing sometimes.

Given that RefDB isn't a resource hog so speed is not an issue, I
still think though that PG should be prefered over MySQL in case you
have the choice.

Thank you for your clarifications!

Tschö,
Torsten.

-- 
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
                   Jabber ID: [email protected]


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H