RISX vs. RIS
"Markus Hoenicka" <[email protected]> Tue, 5 May 2009 22:47:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.refdb.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Torsten Bronger writes: > The data model of my front-end is RISX. Where can I get information > about how to interpret the RISX fields for the different types? > http://refdb.sourceforge.net/risx/index.html is of some help but it > is rather limited. The most comprehensive tables can be found in > <http://www.referencemanager.com/support/docs/ReferenceManager11.pdf>, > pp 525 ff. But this makes is necessary to map RISX to RIS. Is > there information about this? > The mapping is not documented at this time except in the source code. The tricky thing to understand is that RIS uses weird rules to assign authors and titles to the A1-A3 and T1-T3 fields, whereas risx attempts to use a much saner analytical=1, monographic=2, series=3 approach. The other risx elements map to RIS fields according to the RefMan table in a fairly straightforward fashion. I guess you're asking for an even larger table which shows the mapping between real world items, RIS fields, and risx elements. I realize that this information is helpful, but I won't be able to cough it up in a matter of days. > By the way, RIS seems to have four titles (primary, secondary, > series, periodical), whereas RISX has only three of them. In case > of conferences, RIS uses all four (see page 527). How is this > mapped to RISX? > risx currently does not handle four titles, as I was not able to figure out the difference between "series title" and "proceedings title". With my limited knowledge about conference proceedings I concluded these are the same, but I'm willing to learn. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com