Re: RISX vs. RIS

Torsten Bronger writes:
 > I investigated further and now I'm slightly confused.  The RefDB
 > manual says that RISX should be prefered for communicating with the
 > database, and even that it should be used for backup dumps.
 > However, it can't hold all the data in the database.  For example,
 > if I store a book reference, there is a "volume" and an "edition"
 > field, however in RISX, only "volume" survives.  In other words, the
 > RISX dump is not lossless.  An RIS dump contains all fields, though.
 > 

If a risx dump does not contain all data, the risx backend must be
considered broken. Could you please send some test data which help me
reproduce the problem?

thanks
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka
[email protected]
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka")
http://www.mhoenicka.de

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com