Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages
"Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > Quoting James Kass <[email protected]>: > >> After all, in UNIHAN.TXT there >> are many single characters with more than one definition. Just >> as there are many English words with more than one meaning. >> >> (Examples exist, like U+3ADA (?) and U+66F6 (?).) > > > The two charcaters have different meaning, though i have to admit I am > hard pushed to find a font that maintains the differnce in the bottom > half of the character 曰 U+66F0 and 日 U+65E5 respectively. Yeah, and an "x" in English has a different meaning (sound) than an "x" in Spanish (letters "mean" sounds; Chinese graphs mean words. More or less). Yet we still encode them the same because they look the same. Unicode generally tries to code what's written more than what's meant, I thought. ~mark