Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

"Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:
> Quoting James Kass <[email protected]>:
>
>> After all, in UNIHAN.TXT there
>> are many single characters with more than one definition.  Just
>> as there are many English words with more than one meaning.
>>
>> (Examples exist, like U+3ADA (?) and U+66F6 (?).)
>
>
> The two charcaters have different meaning, though i have to admit I am 
> hard pushed to find a font that maintains the differnce in the bottom 
> half of the character &#26352; U+66F0 and &#26085; U+65E5 respectively.
Yeah, and an "x" in English has a different meaning (sound) than an "x" 
in Spanish (letters "mean" sounds; Chinese graphs mean words.  More or 
less).  Yet we still encode them the same because they look the same.  
Unicode generally tries to code what's written more than what's meant, I 
thought.

~mark
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.