Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages

Mike wrote,

>> I am certain that what was meant was, "If the allocation of CJKV code 
>> points continues to be done in this way, then modern CJKV coverage 
>> will require not only BMP and plane 2 support but also, in the 
>> future, plane 3 support."
>
>I'm uncertain as to what the problem being discussed is.  Once you have
>support for plane 2, you automatically support plane 3 (and planes 4, 5,
>6, etc.) at least from an encoding perspective (UTF-xx). ...

You'd think.

If I recall correctly, the Internet Explorer browser supported
UTF-8 for Plane Two long before it supported UTF-8 for Plane One.

Best regards,

James Kass