Re: Level of Unicode support required for various languages
"Ben Monroe" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/30/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Ben Monroe <[email protected]>: > > > On 10/30/07, John H. Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Andrew West wrote: > >> > >> > On 29/10/2007, Peter Constable <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I guess I assumed that that was never intended to provide a > >> >> substitute for encoding the characters needed for Zhuang text -- it > >> >> would be a terrible way to represent Zhuang text, though I suppose > >> >> you can argue (as you have done) that it's valid. > >> > > >> > I'm sure that John has never suggested that IDS sequences should be a > >> > substitute for encoding, merely that given what the Unicode Standard > >> > currently says, it would be a feasible interim solution. > >> > > >> > >> TUS is most emphatic on this point: An IDS is *not* the same thing as > >> encoding. It should be considered a better-than-nothing stop-gap > >> until something appropriate comes along (either an encoded character > >> or a registered variation sequence). I suppose that a text in say > >> Zhuang could use a custom font to hide the fact that most of it > >> consists of IDSs, but in such a case Unicode explicitly warns that no > >> operation other than display-related ones will likely work. Using an > >> IDS in running text is a hack. > > > > Considering the rejected characters, "until" does not seem appropriate. > > For such IDS is the only option. And not much of an option either > > since very few environments can actually render it. > > > > <U+2FF5 U+9580 U+9F8D> ? > > An interesting first character <U+2FF5 U+9580 U+9F8D>, which an IDS > parser would not find too difficult. Is this someone's name? This > character is a good example, in that it is clearly not in the already > encoded CJKV charcters, there are no unification issues about this. Yes, my surname. I mentioned it around March 2002 on this list. You may find it in L2/07-161 (Index UTC00119) and the status is "Not to encode". <U+2FF5 U+9580 U+9F8D> 弁 Tōkyō, Japan