Re: Tamil Sri / Shri
"Mahesh T. Pai" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(A general remark; not just related to the quoted text alone) James Kass said on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:20:02PM -0800,: > So, I'm wondering how the symbol which represents the god > Luxmi, benevolence, and/or good fortune is used in text. > You mention that the other dictionary also uses the same form. > Do the words listed in Pic1 ever get written using the symbol > at the top of Pic1? 1. Background:- Two-three weeks back, I had taken a rather long holiday and was holed up at a remote place, far, far, away from technology. There were two native speakers of Tamil with me, and neither was a "student" of Tamil in any sense. They were just ordinary "users" of the language. One was based in Chennai (aka Madras), the other was at Avanashi, near Coimbatore, and hence was familiar with Malayalam. 2. What I learned:- a. Tamil writing is very different from speaking. In several situations, Tamil does use same glyph/character to represent several sounds, and the user has to guess the correct pronunciation from the context. This is distinct from the Malayalam writing (according to the guy from Avanashi) where writing tends to follow the spoken sound as closely as possible."Vaamozhi is different from varamozhi" is the exact word he used. He gave illustrations also - "sivan", "laxmi" etc are written using the "sa" as in "sapta (seven)"; but the user has to pronounce it as in "shear". There are glyphs for the "sh" sound in Tamil; but that glyph is an 'invention' for writing Sanskrit words. b. Some kind of script reform has taken place within past 3-4 decades. I was shown a book - "Bhajanavali", published from Chennai (Mylapore) by some organisation related to Satya Sai Baba. The word "bhajanavali" was printed differently on the cover page and inside. The "ii" marker was a bit like the "ii" marker in the images of both "Sri" above, and "na" glyph was a bit like Old script Malayalam "nu". -- Mahesh T. Pai <<>> http://paivakil.blogspot.com/ A: Because it fouls thef order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?