Re: Tamil C(S)ivamayam

"Sarves K" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11/7/07, Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bala (Sri Lanka) wrote:
>
> > The civamayam is very commonly used in Tamil text. In present days
> > compare to day sign and Tamil number 2, the civamayam symbol used very
> > frequently.  This been used in start of books, almost 90% of the Tamil
> > wedding cards and so on.
> >
> > But when I am looking at the shape I cannot see the difference between
> > Tamil day sign and civamayam.
>
> Neither can I, though both are clearly different from the digit 2.
>
> > (1)    Why there is no code point to the civamayam symbol in Unicode?
> > Is that because of the same/similar glyph?
>
> Perhaps.  Has anyone ever proposed encoding it separately?  Is it
> encoded separately in any other coded character encoding?
>
> > Or Tamils missed out to list to Unicode?
>
> I wouldn't recommend going down this path.
>
> > (2)    Are we expected to use the 0BF3 – Tamil Day sign for civamayam
> > as well?
>
> In American English, the same coded character, U+002E, is used:
>
> * as a sentence terminator
> * as a marker for certain abbreviations
> * as a decimal separator
> * as part of an ellipsis indicating continuation
> * as a separator between parts of a URL or IP address
> * as part of a "dotted leader" in a table of contents
> * and probably for other purposes as well.
>
> If you wish to propose disunifying the civamayam symbol from U+0BF3, you
> will probably need to explain how that situation differs from the U+002E
> situation.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
> NEW E-MAIL -->  dewell at roadrunner dot com
> NEW URL -->  http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell
> http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ
>
>
>
We can't compare U+002E and U+0BF3. Because, U+002E doesn't have any defined
meaning – it's an ambiguous character (
http://unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-6.html). Therefore it can be used to
represent anything.

But if you take U+0BF3, it has a defined meaning (The Day sign).

So I don't know whether it is good to use U+0BF3 for Civamayam?

Thanks,

Sarves (Sri Lanka)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.