Character allocation.
"Russ Stygall" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000f01c82838$4fdb7080$0202a8c0@acerfcafbfa90d> |
Greetings, Is there a reason for different allocations between Unicode and ISO/IEC for 'Supplemental Punctuation' @ 5.1.0? http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html = Common description = http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3269.pdf 2E20=LEFT VERTICAL BAR WITH QUILL =2E40 2E21=RIGHT VERTICAL BAR WITH QUILL =2E41 2E22=TOP LEFT HALF BRACKET =2E42 2E23=TOP RIGHT HALF BRACKET =2E43 2E24=BOTTOM LEFT HALF BRACKET =2E44 2E25=BOTTOM RIGHT HALF BRACKET =2E45 2E26=LEFT SIDEWAYS U BRACKET =2E46 2E27=RIGHT SIDEWAYS U BRACKET =2E47 2E28=LEFT DOUBLE PARENTHESIS =2E48 2E29=RIGHT DOUBLE PARENTHESIS =2E49 2E2B=ONE DOT OVER TWO DOTS PUNCTUATION=2E2C 2E2C=SQUARED FOUR DOT PUNCTUATION =2E2E 2E2D=FIVE DOT MARK =2E2F 2E2E=REVERSED QUESTION MARK =2E34 2E2F=VERTICAL TILDE =2E3B 2E30=RING POINT =2E38 Russ Stygall p.s. UnicodeData-5.1.0d10.txt concurs with Pipeline.html