Odp: Re: RE: Why was L2/25-061 provisionally assigned?

I know that there is no evidence for a compatibility codepage for the character proposed in L2/25-061, but I'm talking about the precedent for composing spacing diacritics with combining characters, not for encoding precomposed forms.   Dnia 17 kwietnia 2025 23:09 Doug Ewell <[email protected]> napisał(a):  [email protected] wrote:   And there is already precedent of spacing diacritics composed with  combining characters, particularly U+0385 which is composed as U+00A8  U+0301 (although the precomposed version is encoded as it's essential  for CP869, CP1253, and ISO 8859-7 compatibility).   No character that was encoded solely for compatibility with existing character sets (and it looks like U+0385 is one of those) ever serves as a precedent for encoding other similar characters for which the compatibility issue does not apply.   --  Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org