gmane.text.unicode.general

10525 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

RE: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sun, 14 Jun 2026 07:30:48 -0400
Phil Smith III via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10533
Re: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:01:57 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10532
RE: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 20:44:11 +0200
Piotr Karocki via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10531
Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:04:47 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10530
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:12:28 +0200
Piotr Karocki via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10529
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 13 Jun 2026 01:29:44 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10528
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:07:28 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10527
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:05:59 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10526
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:46:12 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10525
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:37:07 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10524
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:34:51 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10523
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:27:24 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10522
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:15:09 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10521
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 20:31:17 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10520
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 19:29:21 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10519
Re: Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 20:01:05 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10518
Re: Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 16:41:28 -0700
asmusf--- via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10517
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Tue, 9 Jun 2026 18:42:45 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10516
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Mon, 8 Jun 2026 02:55:53 -0500
David Starner via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10515
Re: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 19:44:52 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10514
RE: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 14:37:53 +0000
Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10513
Re: Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Tue, 2 Jun 2026 12:08:31 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10512
Tulu-Tigalari digits and numerals
Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:30:44 +0200
Philippe Verdy via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10511
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:01:00 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10510
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 19:44:42 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10509
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:44:55 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10508
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:41:41 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10507
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:28:00 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10506
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 17:27:04 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10505
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:25:44 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10504
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:17:15 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10503
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sun, 31 May 2026 13:05:34 -0400
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> • #10502
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 30 May 2026 12:54:50 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10501
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Sat, 30 May 2026 01:34:55 -0700
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10500
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 22:25:31 -0700
Tex via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10499
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 20:43:24 -0700
Bill Poser via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10498
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 18:20:41 -0700
Tex via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10497
RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 23:47:50 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10496
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 23:33:46 +0100
Harriet Riddle via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10495
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Fri, 29 May 2026 17:41:51 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10494
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 21:16:41 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10493
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 14:35:45 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10492
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 17:11:12 +0200
Michael De Roover via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10491
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Thu, 28 May 2026 00:29:41 -0400
Gabriel Tellez via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10490
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 21:15:17 +0100 (BST)
Julian Bradfield via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10489
On ideographs in the SMP, or, Why Plane 4 doesn't have a name yet
Wed, 27 May 2026 10:05:39 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10488
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 09:14:55 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10487
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 13:58:16 +0000
Doug Ewell via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10486
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 08:56:45 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10485
Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Wed, 27 May 2026 08:54:58 -0500
Vikki McDonough via Unicode <[email protected]> • #10484