RE: Klingon tagging (was: RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?)

> In any event, there is a difference between recognizing that something is
> a script
> from an ISO 15924 standpoint and determining that it meets Unicode
> encoding standards.

Ok, but if klingon is officially recognized as script, the only argument to
not include it in Unicode can be based on "we cannot include copyrighted
glyphs". Argument "it is not used" is invalidated.