Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?

Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]> Sat, 30 May 2026 01:34:55 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.text.unicode.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------Y514pjMp3oGkBn10bP8KCEsV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/29/2026 6:20 PM, Tex via Unicode wrote:
> short circuit these threads?

I see no benefit in "short-circuiting" a water-cooler discussion like 
this list.

That is, as long as it's a real discussion and not someone monopolizing 
the conversation or the list.

A./

--------------Y514pjMp3oGkBn10bP8KCEsV
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/29/2026 6:20 PM, Tex via Unicode
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:[email protected]">
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">short circuit these threads?</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><font face="Candara">I see no benefit in "short-circuiting" a
        water-cooler discussion like this list.</font></p>
    <p><font face="Candara">That is, as long as it's a real discussion
        and not someone monopolizing the conversation or the list.</font></p>
    <p><font face="Candara">A./</font></p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------Y514pjMp3oGkBn10bP8KCEsV--