RE: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
Piotr Karocki via Unicode <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:12:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 6:13 PM Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote: > At any rate, there's always https://qurgh.blogspot.com/ which is a blog By the way, this blogspot is marked as: <html dir="ltr" lang="en-US"> Seems like language is incorrect :) Possible options are defined in IANA Language Subtag Registry. https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry And in this document: Type: language Subtag: tlh Description: Klingon Description: tlhIngan Hol Added: 2005-10-16 Type: script Subtag: Piqd Description: Klingon (KLI pIqaD) Added: 2016-01-04 Type: grandfathered Tag: i-klingon Description: Klingon Added: 1999-05-26 Deprecated: 2004-02-24 Preferred-Value: tlh Further, we have ISO 15924 Information and documentation — Codes for the representation of names of scripts. And even unicode knows about Klingon: https://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924.txt Piqd;293;Klingon (KLI pIqaD);klingon (pIqaD du KLI);;;2015-12-16