Re: Seeming hostility to conlang scripts?
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2026 18:07:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/9/26 9:15 PM, Gabriel Tellez via Unicode wrote: > If we were encoding Klingon as a language I would agree that there is > enough existing work. But the alphabet alone is different. > At any rate, there's always https://qurgh.blogspot.com/ which is a blog not only in Klingon but entirely in pIqaD and NOT in Latin transcription, using the "standard" PUA assignments (and don't you dare say "well, you have the PUA, isn't that enough?" or I'll oppose every possible addition to Unicode on the same grounds.) Does that not suffice for you? ~mark