Future of the BabelStone Han variation selectors
Harriet Riddle via Unicode <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Jul 2025 19:30:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AS2PR02MB973732CA6EAA48BEAD9182EAB752A@AS2PR02MB9737.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> |
The following is the most recent and, as it transpired, potentially final update on the status of the BabelStone Han variation selector sequences: > “It is intended to register a BabelStone Collection in the IVD at a future date when the sequences listed here are stable. […] NB I plan to reassign most of the IVSes marked with an asterisk so they have a unique IVS sequence. When the CAAPH collection is accepted for registration in the IVD I will also need to reassign many of the BabelStone Han IVS sequences which conflict with the collection.” —https://www.babelstone.co.uk/Fonts/BSH_IVS_BETA.html Now, I'd always wondered when “when the sequences listed here are stable” would be—but I was not expecting that it would be as soon as this year that BabelStone's untimely passing, not long before the CAAPH collection was registered, would sadly settle that question. Consequently, I do wonder about the future status of these variation selector sequences, given that the current versions of the BabelStone fonts are presumably either final or, at minimum, would effectively serve as a memorial watershed. In particular, those of the sequences implemented by the current version of the font which do not conflict with existing registered IVSes. —Har.